Pages: [1] |
1. Questions for the experts - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Schmacshmu Originally by: Otocinclus What will it take for CCP to change the Navythron back to it's original glorious black colour? Anti-Spacebush activist also wants to know the answer to this question!!! ...
- by Strider Hiryu - at 2011.06.12 18:00:00
|
2. Questions for the experts - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Strider Hiryu on 12/06/2011 17:16:00 Speaking of frigs, why arnt we seeing more hookbills? They are the pwnage!!! I like beer and cheese...
- by Strider Hiryu - at 2011.06.12 17:16:00
|
3. Sticky:AT9: Banning discussion - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
CCP Sreegs wrote: "This sucks ur an idiot"
- by Strider Hiryu - at 2011.04.08 18:03:00
|
4. Sticky:AT9: Banning discussion - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Logan Fyreite wrote: Not really sure what to say about this... I mean it's obvious to me that this is a bad idea. A real bad idea. If CCP can't see that, just like only allowing the top 4 to auto-qualify, then there isn't much that can be done...
- by Strider Hiryu - at 2011.04.08 17:50:00
|
5. Sticky:AT9: Flagship discussion - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Flexible Flag Ship...... Banning....... = RICH ALLIANCE WIN. With banning involved, flag ships become the only X factor. X factors that can cost 10's of billions, per setup. So alliance's than can afford multiple multi bil flagship setups have a ...
- by Strider Hiryu - at 2011.04.08 17:36:00
|
6. Sticky:AT9: Banning discussion - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
CCP Mindstar wrote: DG J wrote: Utterly terrible... Please just get rid of it now. Also, you demolish strategies for the pre-qualifiers since people bringing under 4 ships will automatically end up with three, and any heavy DPS they brough...
- by Strider Hiryu - at 2011.04.08 16:50:00
|
7. Sticky:AT9: Banning discussion - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
IM IN AUSTRALIA, AND I STAY UP TILL ******* 4am IN THE MORNING, JUST TO GET ******* BANNED, **** THAT ****>>>>
- by Strider Hiryu - at 2011.04.08 16:40:00
|
8. Sticky:AT9: Banning discussion - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
THE SANDBOX, where we limit creativity...............
- by Strider Hiryu - at 2011.04.08 16:39:00
|
9. Sticky:AT9: Banning discussion - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
THIS BANNING IS STUPID GENERIC SETUPS>>>>> BORING> ANYTHING THAT ISNT GENERIC HAS AN OBVIOUS STRONG SHIP, THAT GETS BANNED. THIS MEANS FLAG SHIP EVERY MATCH. THIS MEANS RICH ALLIANCE WIN EVERY TIME>>>> FAIR??? NO. FIX...
- by Strider Hiryu - at 2011.04.08 16:36:00
|
10. How To Improve The Alliance Tourney - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
I has a friend with a damnation that tanked a pos for 10 mins... That is the dumbest comment ever. That aside. Positive input to make the AT more fun. More informative commentary from the commentators, less diagnosis. Save the diagnosis for inbetw...
- by Strider Hiryu - at 2010.06.11 08:20:00
|
11. 0.0 Alliances live this everyday. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
100% Fact Empire people are simple minded. Unable to fathom the superior tactics of 0.0 Also following FC orders in a 200 man gang like sheep is EXTREMLY hard, Only a hardernd 0.0 PVPer could manage such draining mental stimulation. 0.0 Will PWN t...
- by Strider Hiryu - at 2010.06.06 21:11:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |